Contextual Structure Of An Article Critique (Example)

NameInstitutionDateArticle CritiqueTitleBotica M, Carcaxhiu L, Kern J, Kuehlein T, Botica I, Gavran L, Zelić I, Iliev D, Haralović D & Vrca A 2017, ‘ Missing risks in opportunistic screening for type 2 diabetes - CroDiabGP study’, Medicinski Glasnik, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 122-127. IntroductionIn the introduction, the researchers have given a detailed explanation of the scope of the research problem. The authors have explained clearly that the focus of the study was to examine the methodology for identiofying risks for type 2 diabetes using a combination of two different methods – family medicine (FM) and electronic medical records (ERM). The statement problem is in agreement with the title of the research and is deemed to be of medical practice significance. The problem is clearly visible to the average reader although the authors have delved deep into the technical jargon, a reflection of the article’s intended audience (Murray & Sarah 2006, p. 54). The article does not have a comprehensive literature review. Instead, the authors have incorporated some literature into the introduction part. The list of references appearing in the bibliography section shows that although there was no separate chapter for the