7-3 Video Check-In Southern New Hampshire University 02:03:34 GMT -05:00The company in the case scenario has a structure that is very complex. According to the organization overview, the company operates under a tall matrixed structure design. This causes decisions to be lengthy and communication to become cumbersome. Despite this, some advantages the company has are many functional COEs where increased structure, governance, and control allow for resources and process efficiencies. The company follows a centralized and standardized approach.The structure limits innovation by pulling specialists from functional areas to work on a specific project. Also, the way the structure is described as “complex†making it difficult to accurately count the levels of hierarchy says that employees are expected to work on designated projects only. With the way the current organizational structure is, I think that I would highly recommend changes to the organizational structure. Main change that will take place is communication.Company culture can make or break innovation. Company culture translates to customer satisfaction, improved products and services, employee retention, and overall employee morale. If the organization has limited communication, it can become cumbersome and drag down innovation. Personally, I believe communication is a large key to a