Idrl 320 Final |95 Questions| With Correct Answers.

International Woodworkers of America Local 2-69 v. Consolidated Bathurst (1983) {Ans: Issue: whether the employer violated the duty to bargain in good faith by failing to disclose its intention to close the Hamilton plant to the union during collective bargaining. Decision: yes, the employer violated the duty to bargain in good faith. First, an employer must answer questions truthfully. Second, an employer must disclose on its own initiative decisions that have already been made and that will have a significant impact on terms of employment, such as discontinuance of the workplace. Significance: it clearly shows that parties to collective bargaining must present all known and necessary information during collective bargaining, and that damages can still be awarded even if the workplace shutdown.}Undue Hardship {Ans: The legitimate defence that an employer may raise to justify why it could not provide an accommodation to an employee.}Just Cause {Ans: An employer's legal reason for firing an employee}RWDSU Local 558 v. Pepsi-Cola Canada Beverages (2002) {Ans: Issue: was whether secondary picketing during a lawful work stoppage is illegal per se. Decision: no, secondary picketing during a lawful work stoppage is not illegal, because it is protected under the freedom of