Business Law Study Guide Graded A+

plaintiff negligence per se {Ans: Res ipsa loquitor and ________ have been created to help a ______ when there is no direct evidence of negligence.}No, because this was an unfortunate accident, and thus Kara will not be liable for any damages she caused. {Ans: It was an extremely hot day in New York City. Kara was standing in a subway car when, suddenly and without warning, she suffered a fainting spell causing her to collide with a fellow passenger, who in turn fell and sprained his ankle. Is Kara liable for the damages to the passenger?}unreasonable negligence {Ans: Behavior that causes _______ harm to others and is the result of failure to exercise reasonable care is known as ______.}nothing {Ans: Philip was driving his car and failed to see a stop sign. He hit a car driven by Oscar. Oscar was not wearing his seatbelt at the time of the crash, and thus sustained more serious injuries than he would have had if he had been wearing his seatbelt. The court found that both parties were negligent. If this was a contributory negligence jurisdiction, then Oscar would be able to recover: _______.}a dram shop act.