How The Previous Paper Compares To Ones Written By Ai

KadinMcElwainMrs.GageResearchW riting1011stSeptember2023HowThePreviousPaperComparesT oOneGeneratedByAIOneofthelatesttechnologicaladvancementsintheworldrightnowareA.I.essaygeneratorssuchasChat-GTP ,whichcancreateessaysforyouinnotimeatall.Itcancreateessaysinanystylebypullingfromdif ferentsourcestomakeawholenewessay ,whichhascausedcontroversyintheacademiaindustry .InclassonW ednesday ,weturnedinapaperonwritingstyles,inthesenseofRoseandLamott,beforeexperimentingwithChat-GTP ,theSnapchatAIBot,andmoreAIgeneratorswiththepromptfromthepreviousassignment.Inthispaper ,IwillcomparemypreviousworktotwoAI-generatedessaysandobservetheconcisenessofeachpiece,thechoiceofwordsofeachessay ,andwhetherornottheAIhasitsownvoice.First,IputthepromptinmyownwordstoseewhattheAIcouldcomeupwith.WhenobservingAISourceOne,Isawthattherewasalackofprofessionalismintheintroduction,whichbeginswiththeword,Certainly!(OpenAI,2023).ItwasalmostliketheAIinAISourceOnewasjusthavingacasualconversationwithme,asopposedtomypiece,whereIbeganwithaproperattentiongrabber ,whereItalkaboutapersonalexperienceinwriting.Then,lookingatthebodyparagraphsofAISourceOne,InoticedalackofsimilaritiesinmyownessayandtheAI-generatedone.TheAItriestousetoomanyfancywordsandhasnorespectforcitingsources,whileIcitemysourcesinmyessayandkeepitsimplistic,soastonotconfusethereader .Additionally ,inAISourceOne,Inoticedthattherewasalackofparagraphstructure,whichmostlyconsistedofone-sentenceparagraphs.AISourceT wo,whereIputintheexactpromptword-for -word,wasmuchworsetoobserve.Itfocusedexclusivelyonmaintainingtheessayrequirements,whichitannouncedintheessay ,ratherthantheactualquestionsbeingasked,beginningwithIunderstandtheessayrequirements(OpenAI,2023).Thisresultedinthepaperbeingonehugemess.JustlikeAISourceOne,SourceT wohasnocitationsorproperparagraphstructure,unlikemyessay .Additionally ,SourceT wogoesmoreindepththanSourceOnedid,whichalmostfixestheessay .Butitstillendsupbeingruinedwithaddressingtherequirementsintheessay ,whichisn tsomethingahumanwoulddo.Inthisessay ,IobservedtwoAI-generatedessaysrelatingtothepreviouspromptandcomparedthemtomyhuman-generatedessay .BothAI-generatedsourcesweremessyandnon-original,whilethehuman-madeessayhadoriginalityandmaintainedprofessionalismatthesametime.Thisshowsthathuman-generatedmaterialisbetter .W orkCitedOpenAI.(2023).ChatGPT(Mar14version)[Lar gelanguagemodel].https://chat.openai.com/chat