This study source was downloaded by 100000859819779 from CourseHero.com on 02-25-2023 10:01:04 GMT -06:00https://www.coursehero.com/file/163935763/JURI-515-Case-Briefsdocx/ Case Briefs AssignmentJURI 515Brittany L. Thompson Dr. Susan PatrickMay 15, 2022Resubmitted with Approval: May 28, 2022This study source was downloaded by 100000859819779 from CourseHero.com on 02-25-2023 10:01:04 GMT -06:00https://www.coursehero.com/file/163935763/JURI-515-Case-Briefsdocx/Case Briefing forDerby v. Derby, 378 S.E.2d 74 (Va. Ct. App. 1989).FactsOn Monday, July 9, 1984, at 8:00 a.m. Mrs. Derby went to the beauty shop owned by the couple to contact her estranged husband. Mrs. Derby had Mr. Derby sign a separation agreement that is in question as to being unconscionable. The agreement was signed on the hood of her car withoutallowing Mr. Derby or his attorney the opportunity to fully review. The agreement gave Mrs. Derby sole ownership of the marital property that they had worked together to build, which were apartments valuing $260,000 or more if converted into condominiums. In this divorce case, it was determined whether the evidence presented to the trial court sufficed to set aside a written property settlement agreement on the grounds of unconscionability and constructive fraud or duress.Procedural HistoryWife appealed the decision of the circuit court that held that a separation agreement was invalid and awarded a divorce to the