Name:Professor:Title:Date:IntroductionRight and wrong is often defined by a society. It is associated with the society’s beliefs, values and norms. What is objectively right or wrong also varies on an individual level. For individuals who are religious, the sense of right or wrong is defined by their belief and religious teachings. Almost all religions advocate for a moral high ground. However, the ethical approach to right and wrong stems from the western philosophical tradition (Johnston 107). This paper seeks to agree with the statement, “there is no objective right and wrong because people never agree about what is right and wrong”.DiscussionObjective right and wrong can be understood from an ethical perspective. Aristotle’s ethics can be applied from a consequentialist approach to determine what is right or wrong (Lacewing 149). The statement can, therefore, be understood from an ethical perspective. The result or end of an act can either be positive or negative to the parties involved. Ethics is defined as the study of human actions, ends and character. This approach does define the right or wrong act neither does it define the desired end. It informs us of what satisfaction in life as a result of right actions is.