2-2 Journal: Estate Planningsouthern New Hampshire Universit

2-2 Journal: Estate PlanningSouthern New Hampshire University 02:34:10 GMT -05:002-2 Journal: Estate PlanningFor module two, we read the case of Boger vs. Baker which was regarding a will that had been challenged because the intent was not clearly stated in the will. Thomas Boger had passed away in June of 2014, which led to an inventory and appraisal to be filed for his estate. The appraisal was filed through the probate court in December of the same year, it was then approved by the court. Thomas’s property was located at 13300 Diagonal Road, Salem, Ohio and was used as a farm in the past. Thomas’s inventory was valued at $99,705.00 for all tangible personal property found at the property (Kubasek, 2023). The value of intangible property was$624,811.06 and real estate property was valued at $173,070.00 during the appraisal. The total of Thomas’s estate was appraised at $915,586.06 which was divided into three groups. The groups were trucks/auto/farm equipment, shop tools, and heated shop.Thomas’s will had two bequests stated, one was specific, and one was residual. Thomas had stated that his brother Charles was meant to inherit the real estate and all contents of the real estate located on