Ncaa V Alston 12 Correctly Answered Questions Latest Update

Who are the original plaintiffs? {Ans: Initially, the plaintiffs were Alston, a former RB at WVU, as well as other former collegiate athletes. In the Supreme Court Case, the NCAA were the petitioners as they were the ones who brought the case}Justice Kavanaugh's Concurring Opinion {Ans: Kavanaugh agreed with the ruling but wanted to take it a step further -Argues that all of the NCAA's limits on compensation violated Section 1 Argues for 3 reasons: -The court doesn't address the legality of the NCAA's remaining compensation rules -While the Supreme Court doesn't weigh in on the legality of these rules, the court's decision establishes how any such rules should be analyzed going forward (subject to rule of reason analysis) -There are serious questions whether these remaining limits on compensation can pass a rule of reason scrutiny test A MONOPSONY CANNOT LAUNDER ITS PRICE FIXING OF LABOR BY CALLING IT PRODUCT DEFINITION}Rule of reason analysis {Ans: Used to determine the legality of agreements that may restrict competition. Courts examine both the negative and positive effects of an agreement before determining if it violates antitrust law -Utilizes a "three-step burden shifting" framework -plaintiff initially has to prove the restraint