According to Descartes, how is my clear and distinct idea of a chair different from my innate idea of God? What would Locke say about the idea of God? {Ans: According to Descartes, the idea of God differs from that of a chair because the former is an infinite being that placed the idea of his existence in a finite being, meaning God exists. Locke doubts God's existence since he is incapable of sensing him.}Russell is arguing for why philosophy is valuable. You'll want to think about his argument using his own key ideas: How does he think philosophy is different from science? Does he think philosophy is different from science in a good or bad sense, like one is better than the other, or that they are just different methods each worthy in their own way? Explain. {Ans: According to Russell, philosophy is different from the science in terms of their respective utility. The value of the study of the science lies in practical application of benefiting everyone, but the study of philosophy directly benefits the student himself.Russell think philosophy is different from science in a good sense though he admits that philosophical pursuits have yielded very