Analyze the key arguments for and against the imposition of a legal duty to rescue. Next, select a company with which you are familiar, and determine under what circumstances and to what extent a duty to rescue should be imposed within this company, from both ethical and legal perspectives.According to Eisenberg “A duty that is imposed by law upon one actor, A, to bestir himself to take a low-cost, low-risk, and otherwise reasonable action that will forestall a major loss to another actor, B, although B's peril of prospective loss is not created by A's fault”.As far as American law is concerned there is no duty to rescue, but of course there are exceptions to every law with respect to different situations. In a freight yard of a Railroad company say X, a trespasser Y is present there. Then the conductor of the same train finds the person Y. Then a bystander is not liable to give any indication to the person Y, But the Company Y would be liable for permitting the train to run on the track with having the knowledge of Y’s danger. This law pertains to be different in different countries. But in general an entity