Phi 210 Critical Thinking

For both discussions 1 2, There is no minimum words count or pages,just answer clearly, precise and concise. Discussion 1 Persuasion. Aristotle defines persuading through personal character as our belief that a person is unbiased and has nothing to gain by lying to us. Please respond to the following Please type your answer followed by the question. Describe a time when you chose to believe in the person giving you some sort of information rather than in the situation which, at least on the surface, appeared to be much different from what the person you trusted was saying to you about the situation. In the end, who did you choose to believe The trusted person or the impersonal situation If you had to do it over again, which one would you have trusted Discussion 2 Examining Tu Quoque Fallacies. Please respond to the following Please type your answer followed by the question. Describe a time when you were guilty of the fallacy of Tu Quoque. (If you have ever said, Yes, I did X but she did Y first, then you have committed a Tu Quoque fallacy.) Explain honestly whether you thought that justifying your behavior based on the behavior