What is Wiklers argument for his claim that personal responsibility for health deserves but a peripheral role in health policy Are you persuaded by his argument Answer Wikler accepts the fact that we can be healthier via taking the matter of health care in our own hands but according to him, transmission of personal responsibility may need extensive re-evaluation of compulsions and rights in context of health care and health policy. So, he supports the idea that personal responsibility to secure health should play a tangential role in health policy since the conception of personal accountability for health includes philosophical concerns for instance determination, intentional action, and social liability but, he says that if people are demanded to protect their own health forcefully then it can be considered as interruption in human rights. According to me, concerns showed by Wilker are correct since its not fair to compel anybody to take care of his health himself but, he can be induced for the same without any impulse. For instance IBM Company offers reward to its employees if they could achieve the health targets. This is the positive side of coin as individuals are getting induction only they are not being