Draft Critical Appraisal Of Evidence

Draft Critical Appraisal of EvidenceStudent First Name, Middle Initial(s), Last NameInstitutional AffiliationCourse Number and NameInstructor Name and TitleAssignment Due DateDraft Critical Appraisal of EvidenceMost of the articles had similarities since they discussed issues associated with diabetes. For example, Sun et al. (2019) evaluated the utilization of telemedicine in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among elderly individuals. Ruiz-Roso et al. (2020) assessed the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on the consumption habits of T2DM respondents. However, most of these papers used respondents who had existed for more than forty years. That is due to T2DM being shared among the elderly.The articles had various limitations based on validity and reliability. Sun et al. (2019) had low validity since it relied on imprecise data accumulation for calorie consumption. In addition, Ueno et al. (2021) had low reliability due to the methodology structure. The article did not consider the respondents' dietary and physical habits, which elevated the biasness. Tatoli et al. (2022) used food frequency intake to represent the quantity of food intake. That lowered the validity since the volume of food intake is more accurate. However, other articles