Overseas Tankship vs Morts Dock & Engineering CompanyStudent’s Name:Institution:Course:Date of Submission:Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Company LtdFactsThe key facts were the spillage caused damage by fire to the respondents. In addition, the oil spillage congealed in the respondents’ spillways, disrupting the usage of the slips (Tankship, 1961). No compensation was claimed regarding the issue caused by the interference of the oil spillage to the usage of slips.IssueThe legal issue was whether the oil spillage, which got into respondents' slipways, caused interference regarding the usage of the slips by the respondents. The second legal issue was, what damage extent was the oil spillage to the interference of respondents' usage of the slips? The third issue was, Why were the respondents not compensated for the interference problem?Rule AppliedThe damage caused by the fire due to oil spillage made the respondents suffer. As a result, the respondents were declared winners of the case. The interference due to oil spillage was considered as slight compensation. Oil spills were the root cause of the spills' interference with usage.AnalysisDirect negligence was the root cause of the fire.