Understanding Medical Noncompliance Student NameInstitution AffiliationAnnotated BibliographySteinert, T., & Bergk, J. (2009). A randomized study is comparing seclusion and mechanical restraint in people with serious mental illness. European Psychiatry, 22, S220.This topic examines various issues such as: Do hospital restraint and seclusion policies in a primary metropolitan sector comply with state and federal laws? In addition, the author examines if the healthcare incorporate best practices. In the significant area of staff training and patient safety, the study found out that there was surprising lack of compliance with minimum state and federal necessities performed in order to reduce the risks related to restraint and seclusion. Additionally, the policies failed to incorporate the necessary best practices. This article relates to the area of study because the noncompliance significant level documented by this topic elaborates that by just passing the laws to regulate the application of restraint and seclusion has not provided evidence to be an efficient mechanism for ensuring compliance with the law or prevention of unnecessary deaths and fatal injuries.Blumstein, S. (2014). Improving Hand-hygiene Compliance and Reducing Healthcare Associated Infections with Automated Hand-hygiene Compliance Monitoring. American Journal of Infection Control, 42(6), S117-S118.The significance of