Bus Law Case Study India's Apollo Tyres Ltd

Case StudiesCase 1Answer 1:On the basis of the given case, it could be stated that Cooper Tire is plaintiff. It is because the organization is filed the case against India's Apollo Tyres Ltd. In this case, Apollo Tyres are defendant. It is because this organization has denied from being a part of contract with Cooper Tire. Answer 2: The main key issue in the case is, whether the benefits about the reasonable best efforts would be given to court or not. On the other hand, the other key issue in this case is the organization of Apollo could get the advantages of Cooper joint venture in China, which is not disclosed by the organization during the agreement of contract. In this case, the other issue that may to be resolved is that the organization of Apollo would be bound by the original deal or not. Answer 3:According the analysis of the case, it could be stated that the “teeing up” is a vague word n the contract. It is because that this word could not be understood by the other party in the contract. In the case, the lawyers have used this